Hepatitis E virus: has anything changed?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Infection with hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a global health concern, yet a clinically underdiagnosed cause of acute and chronic hepatitis. The WHO estimates that 20 million people are infected with HEV annually, yet the epidemiology, diagnosis and prevention remain elusive in many clinical settings. RECENT FINDINGS: Orthohepevirus A (HEV-A) genotypes 1 and 2 cause acute, self-limited hepatitis through faecal-oral transmission. In 2022, the first-ever vaccine campaign was implemented as a response to an HEV outbreak in an endemic region. HEV-A genotypes 3 and 4 are zoonotic infections that primarily cause chronic HEV infection in immunosuppressed populations. Pregnant women and immunocompromised persons are at high risk for severe illness in some settings. Another recent advance in our knowledge of HEV is the zoonotic transmission of Orthohepevirus C (HEV-C) to humans, presumably from contact with rodents and/or their excrement. Previously, HEV infection in humans was presumed to be limited to HEV-A only. SUMMARY: Clinical recognition and accurate diagnosis are essential to the management of HEV infection and understanding the global burden of the disease. Epidemiology affects clinical presentations. Targeted response strategies in HEV outbreaks are needed for the prevention of disease, and vaccine campaigns may prove to be an effective part of these strategies.

Humoral and T-cell-mediated immunity to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with liver disease and transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 vaccination induces a varied immune response among persons with chronic liver disease (CLD) and solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). We aimed to evaluate the humoral and T-cell-mediated immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in these groups. METHODS: Blood samples were collected following the completion of a standard SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (2 doses of either BNT162b2 or mRNA-12732), and a subset of patients had a blood sample collected after a single mRNA booster vaccine. Three separate methods were utilized to determine immune responses, including an anti-spike protein antibody titer, neutralizing antibody capacity, and T-cell-mediated immunity. RESULTS: The cohort included 24 patients with chronic liver disease, 27 SOTRs, and 9 controls. Patients with chronic liver disease had similar immune responses to the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 compared with controls following a standard vaccine regimen and single booster vaccine. SOTRs had significantly lower anti-S1 protein antibodies (p < 0.001), neutralizing capacity (p < 0.001), and T-cell-mediated immunity response (p = 0.021) to the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 compared with controls following a standard vaccine regimen. Following a single booster vaccine, immune responses across groups were not significantly different but numerically lower in SOTRs. The neutralization capacity of the B.1.1.529 Omicron variant was not significantly different between groups after a standard vaccine regimen (p = 0.87) and was significantly lower in the SOTR group when compared with controls after a single booster vaccine (p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: The immunogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is complex and multifactorial. Ongoing and longitudinal evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 humoral and cellular responses is valuable and necessary to allow frequent re-evaluation of these patient populations.